Concept and language

Considered as signified and sign, thought and language can be treated as the same thing, and it almost becomes irrelevant whether one talks about the one or the other.  There are all sorts of cautions that are put on this (maps and territory, logic and metaphysics) but here is another one: language and thought do not serve the same end. Language, since it signifies a placitu or by convention, is a public resource we use, like roads or the electric grid (and this remains true even when we use it for private ends).  The concept is the soul becoming another without doubling it (?!?), but more to the point, it is a personal act, and the action is integrally related to the dignity of the person precisely as a person or individual.

1 Comment

  1. MadBad Trad said,

    June 28, 2016 at 9:26 am

    Okay, but I don’t see how one can grasp a concept sans language in the first place. It seems to me that the process of intellection requires language at the moment the agent intellect abstracts the concept from the phantasm. Please respond; I’ld love to explore this.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 214 other followers

%d bloggers like this: