Books and Interpretation. an outline

Books and Interpretation. an outline

(an obvious but under appreciated point)

A book can’t explain what it means. If you ask it to explain itself, it will only say the same thing over and over and over again.

(an important inference)

Whenever a book makes a claim about anything more general than a particular thing, action, person, etc. It cannot explain whether this relatively more universal claim applies to this particular thing, action, person, case, etc.

(an application to a particular)

The Bible, the Koran, The Book of Mormon, The writings of the Vedas, The Gnostic Gospels, L. Ron Hubbard’s Dianectics, etc. are all books.

(Another obvious point)

People can explain what they mean, and they are able to say whether a universal maxim applies in a particular case. They can also get this wrong.

——–

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: