Inevitable God arguments

Any number of theist philosophers have given arguments of the form “everyone, whether he knows it or not, when he addresses X, is addressing God”. Buber claimed the X was “a thou who could only be thou” (or something like this); Frankl and Newman claim that the X is the authoritative voice of conscience (or of life setting a question to us) Tillich saw God as the “ultimate concern” etc. We don’t necessarily have to see this as different from any other account of the “God of the philosophers”. Thomists, for example, can recast the five ways as saying that “everyone, whether he knows it or not, when he looks at a motion (or efficient causality, necessity, good, etc.) is seeing God processing externally from his nature.”

 

About these ads

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 97 other followers

%d bloggers like this: