A nexus of Aristotle and Plato’s disagreement

Aristotle makes two claims about the source of motion:

a.) all motion reduces to something immobile

b.) All motion requires something immobile immanent in the natural world.

Plato disagrees with a. by reducing all motion not to the immobile but to the self-mobile; and he disputes b. by saying that there is nothing immobile immanent in the natural world. All immobility is proper to existing as the ideas.

About these ads

1 Comment

  1. freder1ck said,

    February 27, 2012 at 12:37 pm

    so the unmoved mover is unmoving. Dante’s inferno has a wind that really the beating of Satan’s bat wings-Satan himself locked in the lake of ice; but Dante rises through the heavenly spheres by divine gravity (mediated by Beatrice)…


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 156 other followers

%d bloggers like this: